In February's
CITMA Review, Yana Zhou comments on the UKIPO's decision on Apple Inc.'s opposition to Swatch's applications for SWATCH ONE MORE THING and ONE MORE THING (
O-531-17). Whilst the Hearing Officer found that Apple had not used ONE MORE THING as a trade mark, they concluded that Swatch's actions fell short of standards of acceptable commercial behaviour, and Apple's claim on bad faith was successful. Read the full analysis
here.
SHARE
Tags
Fashion / Trademarks / Tech / Disputes
Found this article interesting today? Send us your thoughts: