In an article for this month’s CITMA Review, Katherine Thompson comments on the IPEC decision in
Kombinat AD v Fox Marble Holdings plc ([2017] EWHC 1408), looking at whether the use made of a mark was sufficient to lend it distinctive character, or whether that use had in fact eroded what distinctiveness the mark might have had to start with. Read the full article
here.
SHARE
Tags
Trademarks / Disputes
Found this article interesting today? Send us your thoughts: